First Lady of Fashion

Photo from the Washington Post
Readers of this blog know I'm a big fan of Robin Givhan of The Washington Post; she's probably my favorite fashion writer and my main go-to gal when I need a good read, fashion news–wise. So when I looked at the Post today and saw she had a front-page story about Michelle Obama's dresses—and better yet—hosted a live Q&A on the web site at 1 p.m. EST, it was like fashion porn for me. In fact anyone interested in reading smart, sane discourse about Michelle's wardrobe should read this article, and while you're at it, do a Robin Givhan search and read some of her other pieces, too. She earned a Pulitzer a couple years ago, the only fashion writer to ever do so, I believe, and it's easy to see why after reading a few of her neatly written, thoughtful pieces.

I've written before about red carpets and so-called fashion police, the latter which throw me into hostility seizures whenever I'm unlucky enough to land on them on TV or in a magazine. Most of the writing you'll find on the Internet, primarily in blogs and message boards, falls into the fashion police category: Either catty, snarky insults or gushing raves, neither of which rarely explain either the vitriol or appreciation behind the critique.

Photo from The New York Times

This is why I'm so drawn to Robin Givhan's writing. Givhan (who I learned from Brian William's NBC broadcast last night is pronounced giv-AHN, not GIVE-en, like I've been saying it) doesn't slide into the catty-trap. Her writing doesn't shoot from the hip or the heart, it references history, a larger picture that puts fashion-as-both-art-and-social-statement (among other things) into perspective. Like she wrote in today's Q&A, "I hate turquoise, but that doesn't mean that people who wear it have atrocious taste." But she also recognizes that "clothing is quite personal, everyone rightly believes their opinion is valid. Sometimes they forget that just because it's valid that doesn't mean that it's the only one with value."

Food for thought for all of us. So can we ban words like "ghastly" "atrocious" "hideous" "frightful," etc, and all their painful variations from our vocabulary while we (try to) critique?
Photo from the Washington Post

I'm not interested in insulting men and women anywhere just because they've stepped outside the box. I'm not interested in adding to the flood of criticisms that inhibit today's celebrities from taking a chance, from dressing interesting instead of just neatly. I'm tired of red carpet shows and their ilk mainly because the commentary depresses me, but also because there's so little fashion and style on display, instead we only see a catwalk of labels and trends.

Incidentally, I think Michelle's white chiffon Jason Wu inaugural gown dress was lovely. It was not a coconut cake or inappropriate for her age or weight or height. She was not an underage bride. It fit, it flattered, it was chic. It was another capture of Mo Obama, the first first lady to arrive in decades whose got the guts and moxie to be herself and not give a damn whose watching.